Land Use - Minnesota, Forested Area

This page last updated: 04/11/2007
Metadata created using Minnesota Geographic Metadata Guidelines


Metadata Summary

Originator Manitoba Remote Sensing Centre
Abstract This land cover data set was derived from 30 meter resolution LANDSAT Thematic Mapper (TM) satellite imagery. Classification is divided into 15 classes with source imagery dates ranging from September 1991 to August 1996. Both a raster and a vector version are available.
Browse Graphic none available
Time Period of Content Date
Currentness Reference Date of source imagery (LANDSAT-5 TM, bands 3, 4, and 5) ranges from September 20, 1991 to August 30, 1996. Data production was conducted during the period of July 1996 to Summer 1998. The image date for each county is listed below:

County _ Image Date:
Aitkin _ 6/13/96
Carlton _ 6/13/96
Cass _ 6/18/95
Cook _ 6/1/94
Crow Wing _ 6/18/95
Hubbard _ 6/18/95
Itasca _ 6/18/95
Koochiching _ 6/18/95
Lake _ 6/1/94
Lake of the Woods _ 8/30/96
Mille Lacs _ 9/20/91
Pine _ 6/13/96
St. Louis _ 6/8/94
Wadena _ 6/18/95
Access Constraints None
Use Constraints Redistribution Conditions: In obtaining these data from LMIC, it is understood that you and/or your organization have the right to use them for any internal purpose. If you modify them, you should document those changes in a metadata record that should accompany all redistributed data. If you transmit or provide these data in any form to another user, the data MUST be accompanied by a copy of LMIC's disclaimer NOTICE.TXT and all documentation provided with the original data set including the full metadata record.

If downloading the data from DNR's Data Deli, you will need to accept DNR's General Geographic Data License Agreement.
Distributor Organization Minnesota Land Management Information Center (LMIC)
Ordering Instructions 1. The ARC/INFO export (coverage) and ArcGRID versions of the county files are distributed on the internet via the DNR Data Deli by clicking below after Online Linkage. Choose 'LandSat-Based Land Use - Land Cover' (vector or raster) from the list of available layers.

2. The ERDAS version is not online. Contact LMIC to place a custom order. Custom orders have a $25 order fee plus $5 per file. If the files are not delivered via FTP, there is a $25 media fee to create a CD, 8mm unix tar tape or zip disk. Pre-payment is required, either by check or purchase order.

To download a SAMPLE file (Wadena County) from this data set to assess whether the data will meet your needs before you order, go to LMIC's FTP site at: ftp://ftp.lmic.state.mn.us/pub/data/phys_biol/landuse . Download a self-extracting 'ZIP' file called mrsc_lu.exe which will contain the following:

- An ERDAS file (.gis) of Wadena County land use (2.2 megabytes).
- Metadata (.htm) file for the dataset
- NOTICE.RTF, an important notice about this data set that can be read by most word processing software, and an ascii text version of the same notice (NOTICE.TXT)

After downloading this self-extracting 'zip' file, simply execute (run) the file. (For example, you can double click it from Windows Explorer or File Manager). Doing this will automatically extract the sample files described above. You can then delete files that you do not need, if any.
Online Linkage Click here to download data. (See Ordering Instructions above for details.) By clicking here, you agree to the notice in "Distribution Liability" in Section 6 of this metadata.

Full Metadata

Land Use - Minnesota, Forested Area

Go to Section:
1. Identification Information
2. Data Quality Information
3. Spatial Data Organization Information
4. Spatial Reference Information
5. Entity and Attribute Information
6. Distribution Information
7. Metadata Reference Information

 
Section 1 Identification Information   Top of page
Originator Manitoba Remote Sensing Centre
Title Land Use - Minnesota, Forested Area
Abstract This land cover data set was derived from 30 meter resolution LANDSAT Thematic Mapper (TM) satellite imagery. Classification is divided into 15 classes with source imagery dates ranging from September 1991 to August 1996. Both a raster and a vector version are available.
Purpose Land use planning, natural resource monitoring
Time Period of Content Date
Currentness Reference Date of source imagery (LANDSAT-5 TM, bands 3, 4, and 5) ranges from September 20, 1991 to August 30, 1996. Data production was conducted during the period of July 1996 to Summer 1998. The image date for each county is listed below:

County _ Image Date:
Aitkin _ 6/13/96
Carlton _ 6/13/96
Cass _ 6/18/95
Cook _ 6/1/94
Crow Wing _ 6/18/95
Hubbard _ 6/18/95
Itasca _ 6/18/95
Koochiching _ 6/18/95
Lake _ 6/1/94
Lake of the Woods _ 8/30/96
Mille Lacs _ 9/20/91
Pine _ 6/13/96
St. Louis _ 6/8/94
Wadena _ 6/18/95
Progress Complete
Maintenance and Update Frequency None planned
Spatial Extent of Data Aitkin, Carlton, Cass, Cook, Crow Wing, Hubbard, Itasca, Koochiching, Lake, Lake of the Woods, Mille Lacs, Pine, St. Louis, and Wadena Counties.
Bounding Coordinates -95.4
-89.5
49.4
45.5
Place Keywords Minnesota, Northeastern Minnesota, Iron Range, Mesabi Range, Aitkin, Carlton, Cass, Cook, Crow Wing, Hubbard, Itasca, Koochiching, Lake, Lake of the Woods, Mille Lacs, Pine, St. Louis, and Wadena Counties
Theme Keywords imageryBaseMapsEarthCover, Land Cover, Land Use, Vegetation Cover
Theme Keyword Thesaurus ISO 19115 Topic Category
Access Constraints None
Use Constraints Redistribution Conditions: In obtaining these data from LMIC, it is understood that you and/or your organization have the right to use them for any internal purpose. If you modify them, you should document those changes in a metadata record that should accompany all redistributed data. If you transmit or provide these data in any form to another user, the data MUST be accompanied by a copy of LMIC's disclaimer NOTICE.TXT and all documentation provided with the original data set including the full metadata record.

If downloading the data from DNR's Data Deli, you will need to accept DNR's General Geographic Data License Agreement.
Contact Person Information Roy Dixon,
Manitoba Remote Sensing Centre
1007 Century Street
Winnipeg, Manitoba R3H 0W4
Phone: 204-945-6594
FAX: 204-945-1365
E-mail: rdixon@nr.gov.mb.ca
Browse Graphic none available
Browse Graphic File Description
Associated Data Sets Land Use - Minnesota, Agricultural and Transition Areas
This data set uses a 17-category classification scheme. It covers 63 counties in the western and southern parts of the state, including the portions of Roseau and Morrison Counties not contained in the Camp Ripley / Beltrami Island State Forest data set. See: http://www.lmic.state.mn.us/chouse/metadata/luse89.html

Camp Ripley and Beltrami Island State Forest Land Use
This data set covers Camp Ripley, a military reservation in northern Morrison County, and Beltrami Island State Forest, in southeastern Roseau County. See: http://www.lmic.state.mn.us/chouse/metadata/ripbisf.html

2000 Generalized Land Use for the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area
This data set encompasses the seven county Twin Cities (Minneapolis and St. Paul) Metropolitan Area in Minnesota. See: http://www.datafinder.org/metadata/landuse_2000.htm Also, Generalized Land Use - Historical 1984, 1990, 1997 and 2000: http://www.datafinder.org/metadata/landuse_hist.htm

Clearwater and Beltrami Counties Land Use
See: http://www.lmic.state.mn.us/chouse/metadata/bsuluse.html

Minnesota Land Use and Cover: 1990's Census of the Land
This data set integrates six different source data sets to provide a simplified 8-category overall view of Minnesota's land use / cover. See: http://www.lmic.state.mn.us/chouse/metadata/luse8.html

Minnesota Land Use / Land Cover 1969
This data set contains 9 land use/cover classes interpreted from high altitude aerial photography. See http://www.lmic.state.mn.us/chouse/metadata/luse69.html

 
Section 2 Data Quality Information Top of full metadata Top of page
Attribute Accuracy The data set exhibits a per class and overall classification accuracy of not less than 95 percent. Accuracy assessment was conducted using a random, area-based sampling scheme, with the number of samples per class chosen to reflect the relative area occupied by each class within the individual county-sized areas being evaluated. Random samples were generated within each data set being evaluated. Sample areas were then checked against NHAP color infrared photography for correctness within the fixed sample plot. Results of the analysis were plotted in confusion matrices and analyzed for conformance to the 95 percent classification accuracy specification.

The coniferous and mixed forest classifications for Lake County were checked in greater detail since there appeared to be a marked difference in classification at the borders between Lake, Cook and St. Louis Counties (there was more coniferous class in Lake than in the adjoining counties). The Manitoba Remote Sensing Centre obtained forest plot data from the U.S. Forest Service for more than 1,000 points each for Lake and Cook Counties. They found a high level of agreement between the TM-interpreted data and the plot data, but there were a number of pixels that were about two-thirds coniferous and therefore very close to the dividing line between coniferous and mixed forest classification. In Lake County, if these pixels had been classified as coniferous, they were changed to mixed forest.

Note on Category 14 'Young Forest / Regeneration': Several Minnesota Department of Natural Resources staff spot field checked the category of 'young forest/regeneration' against their forest inventory data. Their suggested rewording for the definition of this class is under review:

'This class is made up of areas that have a good likelihood of being young forest which were replanted or naturally regenerated since 1970. It includes lands that were commercially logged or affected by catastrophic events, primarily fire and wind damage.

Caution: Two significant sources of classification confusion exist that result in older forest being classed as young. (1) One source of confusion results because stands having very good conditions for regrowth (measured by site index) mature faster than stands with poor regrowth conditions. The result is older stands with a low site index look very much like younger stands having a higher site index. (2) A second source of confusion is caused by some misclassified mature hardwoods that are found in this category, possibly misclassified because the crown cover is similar to the dense cover such as that which exists in a regenerating aspen stand.'
Logical Consistency Data are stored within a valid ERDAS data structure.
Completeness Data provides complete coverage over the stated extent of the data.
Horizontal Positional Accuracy Unknown. The 30 meter source imagery sampling size automatically introduces a potential offset of this amount. Georegistration processes would likely introduce an additional 30-60 meters offset. Individual area feature boundaries may exhibit additional offsets of up to 1/2 pixel (15 meters) based on theoretical limitations in image sampling devices. Additional offsets may be present due to a lack of boundary clarity between some classes, edge pixel effects, and image post-processing (smoothing) effects.
Vertical Positional Accuracy Not applicable
Lineage Data Sources:
1. LANDSAT-5 TM imagery (bands 3, 4, and 5). The path/row number and image date for each county are listed below:

County_Path/Row_Image Date:
Aitkin_027/028_6/13/96
Carlton_027/028_6/13/96
Cass_028/027_6/18/95
Cook_026/027_6/1/94
Crow Wing_028/027_6/18/95
Hubbard_028/027_6/18/95
Itasca_028/027_6/18/95
Koochiching_028/027_6/18/95
Lake_026/027_6/1/94
Lake of the Woods_027/028_8/30/96
Mille Lacs_027/028_9/20/91
Pine_027/028_6/13/96
St. Louis_027/027_6/8/94
Wadena_028/027_6/18/95

2. Road layers from the Minnesota Department of Transportation BaseMap97 CD.

3. U.S. Forest Service plot data for Lake and Cook Counties.

Manitoba Remote Sensing Centre Processing Steps:
Landsat Thematic Mapper imagery (bands 3, 4, and 5 only) was classified over county-based areas using a supervised maximum likelihood classification within PCI software. Three iterations of classification were typically performed prior to subjecting the data to an exhaustive manual verification-editing process where each classified area was compared with NHAP 1:60,000 scale color, and black and white infrared photography for correct interpretation. Areas found to be misclassified were recoded or aggregated, as appropriate, at this juncture. Transitional feature types (e.g. coniferous, mixed, deciduous forest classes) were handled by first developing a classification using relatively pure samples of individual types and performing a limited classification around a tightly controlled confidence interval. Mixed classes falling outside of the pure class confidence interval were then allowed to fall out into a single mixed class. Individual county data sets were subjected to the classification accuracy assessment process outlined in the Attribute Accuracy section of this report.

The road category was created by using the road layers from the Minnesota Dept. of Transportation BaseMap97 CD. These ARC/INFO coverages were rasterized to a 30 meter cell layer. This was then overlaid on the land use files and the road pixels replaced any existing pixel classification.

Completed PCI files were exported to ERDAS format.

The forest classifications for Lake County were somewhat revised after comparison with the U.S. Forest Service plot data (see Attribute Accuracy element).

Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Processing Steps:
MnDNR created a vector version of the dataset. They converted the ERDAS files to ARC/INFO GRID format. They then used the NIBBLE function in ARC/INFO Spatial Analyst to remove road features (since the road category had not been derived from the original satellite interpretation). NIBBLE used a Euclidean distance-nearest neighbor algorithm to reassign values to the pixels that originally were assigned road class values. Because the road pixels existed singly or in groups of two, the NIBBLE function effectively reassigned all of these pixels in a single processing pass. After eliminating the road pixels, DNR staff used the GRIDPOLY command in ARC/INFO to create dissolved vector representations of the land cover areas. No splining or generalization processes were applied to the lines.
Source Scale Denominator 60000
 
Section 3 Spatial Data Organization Information Top of full metadata Top of page
Native Data Set Environment ERDAS
Geographic Reference for Tabular Data None
Spatial Object Type Raster
Vendor Specific Object Types Cell
Tiling Scheme County
 
Section 4 Spatial Reference Information Top of full metadata Top of page
Horizontal Coordinate Scheme UTM
Ellipsoid GRS80
Horizontal Datum NAD83
Horizontal Units Meters
Distance Resolution Unknown
Altitude Datum Not applicable
Depth Datum Not applicable
Cell Width 30
Cell Height 30
UTM Zone Number 15E
Coordinate Offsets or Adjustments None
 
Section 5 Entity and Attribute Information Top of full metadata Top of page
Entity and Attribute Overview 1 - Cultivated Land
Includes those areas under intensive cropping or rotation, including fallow fields. Fields seeded to forage or cover crops are included. The fields exhibit linear or other patterns associated with current or recent tillage.

2 - Deciduous Forest
Includes areas with at least two-thirds or more of the total canopy cover composed of predominantly woody deciduous species. It may contain coniferous species but is dominated by deciduous species. It includes woodlots, shelter belts, and plantations.

3 - Water
Includes permanent water bodies such as lakes, rivers, reservoirs, stock ponds, ditches, and permanent and intermittently exposed palustrine open water areas where photo evidence indicates that the area is covered by water the majority of the time.

4 - Grassland
Includes areas covered by grasslands and herbaceous plants. May contain up to one third shrubs and/or tree cover. Areas may be small to extensive and range from regular to irregular in shape. These areas are often found between agricultural land and more heavily wooded areas, along right-of-ways and drains. Some areas may be used as pastures and be mowed or grazed, and may range in appearance from very smooth to quite mottled. Included are fields which show evidence of past tillage but now appear to be abandoned and grown to native vegetation or planted to a cover crop.

5 - Mixed Forest
Areas of forest where the canopy is composed of approximately equal amounts of deciduous and coniferous species.

6 - Wetlands: Marsh and Fens
Grassy, wet areas with standing or slowly moving water. Vegetation consists of grass and sedge sods, and common hydrophytic vegetation such as cattail and rushes. Areas are often interspersed with channels or pools of open water.

7 - Wetlands: Bogs
Peat covered or peat filled depressions with a high water table. The bogs are covered with a carpet of sphagnum and ericaceous shrubs and may be treeless or tree covered with black spruce and/or tamarack.

8 - Farmsteads and Rural Residences
Farmsteads include farmhouse and adjoining farmyard area. Includes machinery storage buildings, grain storage buildings, corrals, livestock holding and feeding areas directly associated with farmyard area.

9 - Coniferous Forest
Includes areas with at least two thirds or more of the total canopy composed of predominantly woody coniferous species. It may contain deciduous species but is dominated by coniferous species. It includes woodlots, shelter belts, and plantations.

10 - Other Rural Developments
Includes commercial and industrial, cultural and recreational, and agricultural developments not associated with urban areas.

Commercial/industrial developments include substations, communications facilities, power plants, private airstrips, landfills, storage maintenance yards, businesses, factories, lumber mills, commercial livestock/poultry/grain operations.

Cultural/recreational developments include built-up facilities and service areas associated with parks, rest areas, campgrounds, and golf courses. Includes churches, cemeteries, community halls, and rural schools.

Agricultural developments include agricultural facilities not directly associated with farmsteads. Includes machine and grain storage areas, barns and corrals, and isolated buildings and farmsteads that no longer have apparent road access.

11 - Shrubby Grassland
This class includes a combination of grass, shrubs, and trees in which deciduous and/or coniferous treed cover comprises from one third to two thirds of the area, and/or the shrub cover comprises more than one third of the area. This complex is often found adjacent to grassland or forested areas, but may be found alone. These areas are often irregular in shape and vary greatly in size.

12 - Gravel Pits and Open Mines
Areas are stripped of top soil revealing exposed substrate such as sand/gravel. Included are gravel quarry operations, mine tailings, burrow pits, and rock quarries. Natural beaches/sand dunes are included.

13 - Urban/Industrial
Cities, towns, villages with place names. Also includes commercial, industrial or urban developments included within or directly associated with an urban area such as manufacturing or processing plants, power plants, airports, and waste treatment plants.

Rural residences and rural residential complexes include all other non-urban residences including associated structures such as garages, sheds, and assoicated landscaped area. This category includes residences in close proximity with no distinguishable, intervening, non-residential features.

14 - Regeneration/Young Forest
Areas where commercial timber has been completely or partially removed by logging; management activities whose goal is to enhance timber productivity and/or wildlife habitat and to provide age class and species diversity; and catastrophic events, primarily fire and wind damage. These activities have taken place in the last 15 years. Almost all of these areas have been replanted or naturally regenerated into young trees.

NOTE: see Attribute Accuracy element for additional discussion of this definition.

15 - Bare Rock
Includes areas of rock outcrops that lack appreciable soil development or vegetation cover.

16 - Roads and Improved Trails and Rail Lines
Includes all highways, secondary gravel roads, and improved dirt trails, rail lines and utility easements. (This category is only included in the original ERDAS version of the dataset; it is not in the ArcGRID or Arc/INFO coverage versions.)
Entity and Attribute Detailed Citation None
 
Section 6 Distribution Information Top of full metadata Top of page
Publisher Minnesota Land Management Information Center (LMIC)
Publication Date 1999
Contact Person Information Nancy Rader
Data Distribution and Coordination Specialist
Minnesota Land Management Information Center (LMIC)
658 Cedar Street, 300 Centennial Building
St. Paul, MN 55155
Phone: 651-201-2489
FAX: 651-296-3698
E-mail: clearing.house@state.mn.us
Distributor's Data Set Identifier mrsc_lu
Distribution Liability DISTRIBUTION LIABILITY STATEMENT
For data delivered on-line or by physical media by
The Land Management Information Center

Limitations: Although extensive effort has been made to produce error free and complete data, all geographic information has limitations due to the scale, resolution, date and interpretation of the original source materials. You should consult available data documentation (metadata) for these particular data to determine their limitations and the precision to which they depict distance, direction, location or other geographic characteristics. These data may be subject to periodic change without prior notification.

No Warranty: These data are provided as is, without any warranty whatsoever, including but not limited to any warranty as to their performance, merchantability, or fitness for any particular purpose.

Liability: The entire risk as to the results of the use of these data is assumed by the user. LMIC is not responsible for any interpretation or conclusions based on these data made by those who acquire or use it. LMIC shall not be liable for any direct, indirect, special, incidental, compensatory or consequential damages or third party claims resulting from the use of these data, even if LMIC has been advised of the possibility of such potential loss or damage. In States that do not allow the exclusion or limitation of incidental or consequential damages, you may not use these data.

Redistribution Conditions: In obtaining these data from LMIC, it is understood that you and/or your organization have the right to use them for any internal purpose. If you modify them, you should document those changes in a metadata record that should accompany all redistributed data. If you transmit or provide these data in any form to another user, the data MUST be accompanied by a copy of this disclaimer and all documentation provided with the original data set including the full metadata record.

Data Delivered on Electronic Media: If these data have been requested from LMIC on magnetic media, CD-ROM or any other physical media, LMIC will deliver this product in the computer-readable format agreed upon with the requestor. LMIC will re-issue these data if they are determined unreadable by correctly adjusted computer input devices, or when the medium is delivered in a damaged condition. Requests for re-issue of this digital data product must be made within 30 days of the date shipped from LMIC.
Transfer Format Name ERDAS, ArcGRID or ARC/INFO export (coverage)
Transfer Format Version Number
Transfer Size ERDAS: 2.2 - 24.8 megabytes per county. ARC/INFO export: 45 - 339 megabytes per county.
Ordering Instructions 1. The ARC/INFO export (coverage) and ArcGRID versions of the county files are distributed on the internet via the DNR Data Deli by clicking below after Online Linkage. Choose 'LandSat-Based Land Use - Land Cover' (vector or raster) from the list of available layers.

2. The ERDAS version is not online. Contact LMIC to place a custom order. Custom orders have a $25 order fee plus $5 per file. If the files are not delivered via FTP, there is a $25 media fee to create a CD, 8mm unix tar tape or zip disk. Pre-payment is required, either by check or purchase order.

To download a SAMPLE file (Wadena County) from this data set to assess whether the data will meet your needs before you order, go to LMIC's FTP site at: ftp://ftp.lmic.state.mn.us/pub/data/phys_biol/landuse . Download a self-extracting 'ZIP' file called mrsc_lu.exe which will contain the following:

- An ERDAS file (.gis) of Wadena County land use (2.2 megabytes).
- Metadata (.htm) file for the dataset
- NOTICE.RTF, an important notice about this data set that can be read by most word processing software, and an ascii text version of the same notice (NOTICE.TXT)

After downloading this self-extracting 'zip' file, simply execute (run) the file. (For example, you can double click it from Windows Explorer or File Manager). Doing this will automatically extract the sample files described above. You can then delete files that you do not need, if any.
Online Linkage Click here to download data. (See Ordering Instructions above for details.) By clicking here, you agree to the notice in "Distribution Liability" above.
 
Section 7 Metadata Reference Information Top of full metadata Top of page
Metadata Date 04/11/2007
Contact Person Information Nancy Rader, Data Distribution and Coordination Specialist
Minnesota Land Management Information Center (LMIC)
658 Cedar Street, 300 Centennial Building
St. Paul, MN 55155
Phone: 651-201-2489
FAX: 651-296-3698
E-mail: clearing.house@state.mn.us
Metadata Standard Name Minnesota Geographic Metadata Guidelines
Metadata Standard Version 1.2
Metadata Standard Online Linkage http://www.lmic.state.mn.us/gc/stds/metadata.htm


This page last updated: 04/11/2007